![]() Existing research in this area, including our own, has focused on matching test impressions with crime-scene evidence but has largely ignored forensic practice, which typically involves examination of the candidate source shoe itself and matching of physical features of the tread to evidence. We propose to develop statistical models that support robust reasoning about partial or obscured impression evidence and computational implementations of these models that can perform matching and retrieval for category-level (brand, size) identification from partial prints. Interpreting impression evidence requires reasoning about whether class-level and acquired characteristics of a candidate source are likely to have produced a given impression relative to other potential sources. The goal of this project is to develop statistical and computational models to aid the interpretation of impression evidence left by shoe outsoles. We are developing statistical models that support robust reasoning about partial or obscured impression evidence and computational implementations of these models that can perform matching and retrieval for category-level (brand, size) identification from partial prints. Though not themselves examiners we believe this unique data set is critical for developing approaches to analyzing the reproducibility (different examiner) and repeatability (same examiner) of RACs. The individuals in question were students trained by professional examiners. These data also include several instances of an individual marking the same impression at two points in time. Several individuals marked impressions made at different points in time by the same shoe. ![]() Data from a recent study in Israel in which shoes were worn by individuals over the course of a year and repeated impressions were taken can be used to study these issues. This includes questions associated with whether RACs can be reliably annotated, whether RACs persist over time as the shoe is worn, and the relationship between RACs on a shoe and RACs found in crime scene impressions. There is limited data available about the occurrence and persistence of RACs. This project is focused on providing support for existing footwear analysis approaches through further study of RACs. Some CSAFE researchers are considering novel image-based approaches to footwear evidence. If the general properties fit, the forensic expert looks for randomly acquired characteristics (RACs) on the shoe sole and determines if they match RACs on the trace from the crime scene. If these do not fit, then the analysis is stopped and the pair is classified as a non-match. First, general properties such as the pattern, size and wear of the shoe sole are compared to the crime scene impression. This project will also study the persistence of RACs over time (as the shoe is worn) and the repeatability and reproducibility of RAC detection by examiners.įootwear comparison is conducted by experts in two broad stages. ![]() One goal of our research is to develop and validate models that are more realistic for RACS. Existing models to understand the spatial distribution of RACs rely on simplifying assumptions. It is believed that randomly acquired characteristics (RACs) are among the most discriminating features of shoeprints.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |